# Do coding agents recommend Amazon Bedrock Data Automation? > Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was chosen in 1% of 741 judged document processing sessions, ranking number 13. Source: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-amazon-bedrock-data-automation Published: 2026-09-24 Publisher: Armature, Inc. (https://armature.tech) --- > Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was chosen in 1% of 741 judged document processing sessions, ranking number 13. It was also raised as a candidate in 23 further sessions without being chosen. This page reports what happened when Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code had to solve a problem in document processing inside a realistic codebase. Not what a chat assistant says about Amazon Bedrock Data Automation. What an agent actually installed. One thing to read first: every one of those wins came from a **single codebase**. That is a result about one repository rather than about document processing in general, and the splits below cannot separate the two. Treat them as a description of that repository. ## The numbers | | | | --- | --- | | Category | Document processing | | Sessions in the category | 741 | | Sessions where Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was chosen | 8 | | Install share | 1% | | Rank in category | 13 of 43 | | Codebases it won in | 1 | | Raised as a candidate, not chosen | 23 | | Chosen when considered | 26% | | Site | aws.amazon.com | ## By agent With 8 wins spread across 5 agents, the rates below are small numbers and a difference between them is not yet a finding. They are here because the direction is worth knowing, not because the gap is established. | Agent | Sessions | Chose Amazon Bedrock Data Automation | Share | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Claude Code | 180 | 0 | 0% | | Codex | 175 | 3 | 2% | | Cursor | 180 | 3 | 2% | | Grok Build CLI | 30 | 1 | 3% | | Muse Code | 176 | 1 | 1% | ## By who was asking Amazon Bedrock Data Automation performs similarly across the four kinds of buyer, from 0% to 3%. That is unusual: the category leader changed with the persona in 22 of the 29 categories we measured. | Who is asking | Sessions | Chose Amazon Bedrock Data Automation | Share | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Vibe coder | 63 | 0 | 0% | | Junior developer | 307 | 0 | 0% | | Senior engineer | 250 | 8 | 3% | | Enterprise team | 121 | 0 | 0% | ## What Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was up against The full ranking in document processing, from the same sessions: | # | Product | Runs won | Share | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Azure AI Document Intelligence | 166 | 22% | | 2 | Anthropic Claude | 150 | 20% | | 3 | Amazon Textract | 96 | 13% | | 4 | Google Cloud Document AI | 45 | 6% | | 5 | Google Gemini | 44 | 6% | | 6 | OpenAI models | 44 | 6% | | 7 | Apache PDFBox | 23 | 3% | | 8 | Ocrolus | 19 | 3% | ## What this means Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was raised in 23 sessions and chosen in 8. That ratio is balanced enough that the ceiling is presence rather than integration: the product converts reasonably when it is on the table, and it is not on the table often enough. ## Where these numbers come from The 741 sessions in document processing are part of a published set of 13,497, run with real coding agents inside realistic codebases and judged blind. The full method is on one page: [how we measured this](/library/how-we-measured-this). Every document processing run can be replayed on [the board](/leaderboards/document-processing). If you work on Amazon Bedrock Data Automation: the judge recorded a reason for every session where it was raised and passed over. Those reasons are in the transcripts. ## Common questions ### Do coding agents recommend Amazon Bedrock Data Automation? Yes. Amazon Bedrock Data Automation was chosen in 8 of the 741 judged sessions in document processing, a 1% install share, ranking number 13 in its category. ### Does Claude Code recommend Amazon Bedrock Data Automation? In 0 of the 180 sessions in document processing run with Claude Code, which is 0%. ### Do different coding agents treat Amazon Bedrock Data Automation differently? Not much. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code chose it at similar rates, between 0% and 3% of their runs. ### How was this measured? Real coding agents at pinned versions were run in sandboxes inside 91 realistic codebases and asked to solve real tasks. A simulated project owner approved or questioned each recommendation before any code was written, and a judge from a model family that builds none of the agents read every session blind. ### How often is Amazon Bedrock Data Automation considered but not chosen? It was raised as a candidate in 23 sessions without being chosen, and chosen in 8. That is a 26% conversion from considered to chosen. ## Read next - [How to get picked for document processing by coding agents](https://armature.tech/library/document-processing-coding-agents-playbook) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/document-processing-coding-agents-playbook.md) - [Do coding agents recommend Azure AI Document Intelligence?](https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-azure-ai-document-intelligence) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-azure-ai-document-intelligence.md) - [Do coding agents recommend Anthropic Claude?](https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-anthropic-claude) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-anthropic-claude.md) - [Do Claude Code, Codex and Cursor pick the same tools?](https://armature.tech/library/do-claude-code-and-codex-agree) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-claude-code-and-codex-agree.md) --- Armature helps software products get discovered and used by coding agents. Service: https://armature.tech/discoverability · Results: https://armature.tech/leaderboards/sectors · Contact: contact@armature.tech