# Do coding agents recommend OpenAI Vector Stores?

> OpenAI Vector Stores was chosen in 15% of 158 judged vector search sessions, ranking second. Measured with Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.

Source: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-openai-vector-stores
Published: 2026-09-08
Publisher: Armature, Inc. (https://armature.tech)

---

> OpenAI Vector Stores was chosen in 15% of 158 judged vector search sessions, ranking second. It was also raised as a candidate in 1 further sessions without being chosen.

This page reports what happened when Claude Code, Codex and Cursor had to solve a problem in vector search inside a realistic codebase. Not what a chat assistant says about OpenAI Vector Stores. What an agent actually installed.

One thing to read first: every one of those wins came from a **single codebase**. That is a result about one repository rather than about vector search in general, and the splits below cannot separate the two. Treat them as a description of that repository.

## The numbers

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Category | Vector search |
| Sessions in the category | 158 |
| Sessions where OpenAI Vector Stores was chosen | 24 |
| Install share | 15% |
| Rank in category | 2 of 15 |
| Codebases it won in | 1 |
| Raised as a candidate, not chosen | 1 |
| Chosen when considered | 96% |
| Site | openai.com |

## By agent

The three agents land within 8 points of each other on OpenAI Vector Stores, which is closer than most products in this experiment manage.

| Agent | Sessions | Chose OpenAI Vector Stores | Share |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Claude Code | 58 | 6 | 10% |
| Codex | 66 | 12 | 18% |
| Cursor | 34 | 6 | 18% |

## By who was asking

OpenAI Vector Stores does much better with one kind of buyer than another. It won 40% of sessions asked as junior developer and 0% of those asked as enterprise team.

| Who is asking | Sessions | Chose OpenAI Vector Stores | Share |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vibe coder | 45 | 0 | 0% |
| Junior developer | 60 | 24 | 40% |
| Senior engineer | 26 | 0 | 0% |
| Enterprise team | 27 | 0 | 0% |

## What OpenAI Vector Stores was up against

The full ranking in vector search, from the same sessions:

| # | Product | Runs won | Share |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Neon | 54 | 34% |
| 2 | OpenAI Vector Stores **(this page)** | 24 | 15% |
| 3 | Qdrant | 23 | 15% |
| 4 | Typesense | 20 | 13% |
| 5 | Pinecone | 19 | 12% |
| 6 | Meilisearch | 7 | 4% |
| 7 | Elasticsearch | 2 | 1% |
| 8 | turbopuffer | 2 | 1% |

## What this means

A solid second or third position in a category means the agent is genuinely choosing rather than reaching automatically. That is a winnable position, because the inputs it uses can be changed.

The fastest gains are usually in the sessions that were nearly won: read them, find the step where the agent moved on, and fix that step.

## Where these numbers come from

The 158 sessions in vector search are part of a published set of 5,915, run with real coding agents inside realistic codebases and judged blind. The full method is on one page: [how we measured this](/library/how-we-measured-this).

Every vector search run can be replayed on [the board](/leaderboards/vector-search).

If you work on OpenAI Vector Stores: the judge recorded a reason for every session where it was raised and passed over. Those reasons are in the transcripts.

<!-- generated by scripts/write-data-pages.mjs -->

## Common questions

### Do coding agents recommend OpenAI Vector Stores?

Yes. OpenAI Vector Stores was chosen in 24 of the 158 judged sessions in vector search, a 15% install share, ranking second in its category.

### Does Claude Code recommend OpenAI Vector Stores?

In 6 of the 58 sessions in vector search run with Claude Code, which is 10%.

### Do different coding agents treat OpenAI Vector Stores differently?

Not much. The three agents chose it at similar rates, between 10% and 18% of their runs.

### How was this measured?

Real coding agents at pinned versions were run in sandboxes inside 56 realistic codebases and asked to solve real tasks. A simulated project owner approved or questioned each recommendation before any code was written, and a judge from a model family that builds none of the agents read every session blind.

### How often is OpenAI Vector Stores considered but not chosen?

It was raised as a candidate in 1 sessions without being chosen, and chosen in 24. That is a 96% conversion from considered to chosen.

## Read next

- [How to get picked for vector search by coding agents](https://armature.tech/library/vector-search-coding-agents-playbook) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/vector-search-coding-agents-playbook.md)
- [Do coding agents recommend Neon?](https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-neon) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-neon.md)
- [Do coding agents recommend Qdrant?](https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-qdrant) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-coding-agents-recommend-qdrant.md)
- [Do Claude Code, Codex and Cursor pick the same tools?](https://armature.tech/library/do-claude-code-and-codex-agree) (Markdown: https://armature.tech/library/do-claude-code-and-codex-agree.md)

---

Armature helps software products get discovered and used by coding agents.
Service: https://armature.tech/discoverability · Results: https://armature.tech/leaderboards/sectors · Contact: contact@armature.tech
