From the experiment

Do coding agents recommend ElevenLabs Agents?

ElevenLabs Agents was chosen in 8% of 754 judged voice agents sessions, ranking fifth. Measured with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code.

Published October 14, 2026 Read as Markdown

ElevenLabs Agents was chosen in 8% of 754 judged voice agents sessions, ranking fifth. It was also raised as a candidate in 129 further sessions without being chosen.

This page reports what happened when Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code had to solve a problem in voice agents inside a realistic codebase. Not what a chat assistant says about ElevenLabs Agents. What an agent actually installed.

The numbers

CategoryVoice agents
Sessions in the category754
Sessions where ElevenLabs Agents was chosen59
Install share8%
Rank in category5 of 32
Codebases it won in8
Raised as a candidate, not chosen129
Chosen when considered31%
Siteelevenlabs.io

By agent

Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code land within 10 points of each other on ElevenLabs Agents, which is closer than most products in this experiment manage.

AgentSessionsChose ElevenLabs AgentsShare
Claude Code1572113%
Codex217157%
Cursor16795%
Grok Build CLI6023%
Muse Code153128%

By who was asking

ElevenLabs Agents performs similarly across the four kinds of buyer, from 1% to 14%. That is unusual: the category leader changed with the persona in 24 of the 31 categories we measured.

Who is askingSessionsChose ElevenLabs AgentsShare
Vibe coder1341914%
Junior developer9011%
Senior engineer322278%
Enterprise team208126%

What ElevenLabs Agents was up against

The full ranking in voice agents, from the same sessions:

#ProductRuns wonShare
1Retell AI16822%
2Vapi12416%
3Twilio ConversationRelay9913%
4LiveKit Agents9813%
5ElevenLabs Agents (this page)598%
6OpenAI Realtime API496%
7Built in-house (no product adopted)355%
8Grok Voice Think Fast 2.0294%

What this means

ElevenLabs Agents was raised in 129 sessions and chosen in 59. That ratio is balanced enough that the ceiling is presence rather than integration: the product converts reasonably when it is on the table, and it is not on the table often enough.

Where these numbers come from

The 754 sessions in voice agents are part of a published set of 15,287, run with real coding agents inside realistic codebases and judged blind. The full method is on one page: how we measured this.

Every voice agents run can be replayed on the board.

If you work on ElevenLabs Agents: the judge recorded a reason for every session where it was raised and passed over. Those reasons are in the transcripts.

<!-- generated by scripts/write-data-pages.mjs -->

Common questions

Do coding agents recommend ElevenLabs Agents?

Yes. ElevenLabs Agents was chosen in 59 of the 754 judged sessions in voice agents, a 8% install share, ranking fifth in its category.

Does Claude Code recommend ElevenLabs Agents?

In 21 of the 157 sessions in voice agents run with Claude Code, which is 13%.

Do different coding agents treat ElevenLabs Agents differently?

Yes, and by a wide margin. Claude Code chose it in 13% of its runs and Grok Build CLI in 3%.

How was this measured?

Real coding agents at pinned versions were run in sandboxes inside 110 realistic codebases and asked to solve real tasks. A simulated project owner approved or questioned each recommendation before any code was written, and a judge from a model family that builds none of the agents read every session blind.

How often is ElevenLabs Agents considered but not chosen?

It was raised as a candidate in 129 sessions without being chosen, and chosen in 59. That is a 31% conversion from considered to chosen.

Where this comes from

Armature ran 15,287 judged sessions with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build CLI and Muse Code inside 110 realistic codebases, and published every run. The numbers on this page come from that work.

Read next

All library pages